March 21, 2006
After the Canadian Party
Canadian politics is interesting at the moment. No, really it is. It's uncertain whether the recently elected minority Conservative Government will last more than a few months and the Liberal Party have just set out to find a new leader as Paul Martin resigned at the weekend. Everything is in flux, so there are lots of debates and scandals for the media to follow, but I've been here talking about why none of this really matters because beneath the surface, democracy itself is in trouble.
It follows on from the work Tom and I did about the decline of political parties for the FT and I've also been talking about the recent Power Inquiry in the UK. More than one person here has said they think Canada needs its own Power Inquiry as the problems are very similar. My line has been that it's time to look outside formal politics for ways to revitalise democracy. I'm looking for examples of Do-it-yourself Democracy and I'm not having any trouble finding some fascinating projects.
What I've been saying tends to split people in a similar way to the UK. Politicians get defensive while everybody else says yes, they're much more likely to get involved in politics outside of voting or joining a party and they'd love to know more about how to do this effectively.
I recorded an interview about all this for The Current, CBC's flagship current affairs program with Anna Maria Tremonti which will go out tomorrow at 08.30 EST and be available on the web afterwards.
Update: the interview is archived here (scroll down to part three).
Posted by Paul Miller at March 21, 2006 08:26 PM
Comments
Just heard you on the CBC
One of the challenges that I beleive we face is that we have used up the simple logical solutions.
Our scale is creating complexity and that complexity requires something other than the simple, intuitive solutions that are easily communicated by mass media to people who aren't part of the conversation.
Single issue people, candidates, etc, are often looking to impliment a simple, logical(to them), obvious solution.
Our challenge, and that of the existing political parties used to serve this purpose, is to create forums where the interaction of items can be discussed and solutions which encompass more than one concept created.
I am very much against compromise but interested and eager to develop ideas that are synthesized from more than one element. THis building of ideas is not well deveoped or even understood.
Democracy starts with a conversation. We don;t have enough conversations.
Posted by: SolutionSeeking
at April 3, 2006 03:31 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)